Growth at all costs

The Hidden Cost of Growth: Why Fast-Growing Companies Often Destroy Value Instead of Creating It

Last year, I sat across from a CEO celebrating his company’s impressive growth story. Revenue up 40% year-over-year. Expanding market share. Growing team. By all traditional metrics, they were crushing it. Yet six months later, when seeking additional investment, they received a valuation 25% lower than their previous round.

What happened? They fell victim to what I call the “Growth Paradox” – a phenomenon that I’ve seen other companies play out time and time again in my two decades leading finance for global companies with 8, 9, and 10-figure revenues.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: More than 65% of rapidly growing mid-market companies are actually destroying value while appearing successful on paper. After guiding multiple organizations through this treacherous terrain, I’ve discovered that revenue growth – the metric most celebrated in business – often masks deeper problems that silently erode company value.

What is the Growth Paradox? Understanding Value Destruction in Fast-Growing Companies

The Growth Paradox occurs when a company’s increasing revenue coincides with declining fundamental value. This counterintuitive pattern emerges from a simple truth: not all growth is created equal.

During my tenure as CFO across multiple industries, I’ve identified three primary ways growth secretly destroys value:

  1. Rising Customer Concentration Risk: Many growing companies achieve impressive numbers by landing large customers. For example, I had dinner with a CFO from a $200M technology company, 45% of their growth came from just two enterprise clients. While this looked excellent on quarterly reports, it significantly increased business volatility and decreased valuation multiples.
  2. Declining Gross Margin Quality: As companies scale, they often sacrifice pricing power or take on less profitable business to maintain growth rates. In my network I’ve seen some professional services firms grow revenue grow 35%, but unfortunately gross margins silently erode from 40% to 34%. Their market value declined despite impressive top-line growth.
  3. Deteriorating Cash Flow Predictability: Rapid growth frequently leads to increasingly complex cash conversion cycles. One mid-market company saw DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) climb from 45 to 72 days while growing at 30% annually. Their cash flow became increasingly unpredictable, creating significant operational challenges despite their growth narrative.

Key Warning Signs of Value-Destroying Growth That Most Business Leaders Miss

Traditional financial reports often obscure these warning signs. Here are the early indicators that growth is destroying rather than creating value:

1. Efficiency Decline Growing companies should become more efficient, not less. Calculate your Revenue Engine Cost (Total Operating Costs ÷ Revenue) quarterly. If this number is rising during growth, you’re burning more fuel to travel the same distance – a clear warning sign.

2. Customer Metrics Deterioration Watch these three metrics religiously:

  • Customer acquisition costs (should decrease with scale)
  • Customer lifetime value (should increase with experience)
  • Retention rates by cohort (should improve over time)

If these are moving in the wrong direction during growth, you’re buying revenue you can’t afford.

3. The Rule of 40 Imbalance The Rule of 40 (Growth Rate + Profit Margin = 40%+) provides a clear benchmark for healthy performance. While pursuing growth, many companies see this number deteriorate. At a recent CFO roundtable, we found that 72% of companies experiencing valuation declines had seen their Rule of 40 score drop below 25 despite maintaining impressive growth rates.

4. Declining Speed-to-Value How quickly can you convert customer commitment to cash? This cycle should improve with scale, not deteriorate. If your days from commitment to cash are increasing during growth, you’re creating operational drag that ultimately destroys value.

Example: How a $150M Company Reversed Value Destruction Through Strategic Course Correction

A $150M software company was celebrating 50% year-over-year growth when it was discovered their Growth Paradox indicators flashing red. Despite impressive revenue increases, their:

  • Gross margins had declined 7 points
  • Customer acquisition costs had increased 35%
  • The top five customers now represented 40% of revenue
  • Speed-to-value had increased from 65 to 110 days

These metrics revealed that while they were growing fast, they were simultaneously destroying their fundamental value. The company faced a crucial choice: continue their current growth trajectory and risk eventual collapse, or reset their approach to build sustainable value.

Implemented a three-phase strategy:

  1. Re-segmentation: Identified which customer segments delivered both growth and healthy margins, then reallocated resources accordingly.
  2. Value Pricing: Shifted from competitive pricing to value-based pricing in their enterprise segment, accepting slower growth but improving margin quality.
  3. Operational Redesign: Restructured delivery processes to improve speed-to-value, reducing their cash conversion cycle by 30%.

The results? Their growth rate moderated to 30%, but their Rule of 40 score improved from 22 to 37, their valuation multiple expanded by 65%, and they created a sustainable engine for long-term value creation.

Strategic Framework for Sustainable Value-Creating Growth in Mid-Market Companies

After being in financial leadership for over 20 years, I’ve developed a framework for growth that preserves and enhances value:

  1. Measure What Matters: Beyond revenue, track:
    • Rule of 40 performance monthly
    • Customer cohort economics quarterly
    • Revenue quality metrics (concentration, margin, predictability)
    • Operational efficiency during growth
  2. Set Value-Based Targets: Rather than pure growth targets, establish:
    • Minimum gross margin thresholds
    • Maximum customer concentration limits
    • Efficiency improvement requirements
    • Cash flow predictability goals
  3. Create Growth Guardrails: Establish clear boundaries:
    • No growth that reduces gross margins below target
    • No customer relationships exceeding concentration limits
    • No expansion that increases operational complexity beyond defined thresholds
    • No growth initiatives that extend cash conversion beyond targets

The Path Forward: Balancing Growth and Value Creation in 2025 and Beyond

Growth isn’t inherently bad – it’s the lifeblood of business. But growth that destroys fundamental value is a path to long-term failure disguised as short-term success.

As a financial leader, I’ve learned that the most valuable growth creates a virtuous cycle: improved operational efficiency, strengthened customer economics, and enhanced cash predictability. This kind of growth builds durable value that survives market fluctuations and creates sustainable competitive advantage.

Tomorrow morning, take these three steps:

  1. Calculate your Rule of 40 score
  2. Measure your customer concentration percentage
  3. Track your gross margin trend over the last six quarters

What you discover might challenge your current growth narrative – but addressing these realities now could be the difference between building lasting value and watching it silently erode beneath impressive-looking growth numbers.

Remember: Revenue is vanity, profit is sanity, but value creation is the ultimate measure of business success.


The author serves as CFO at a rapidly growing law firm consulting company and previously held senior finance leadership roles in global companies with 9 & 10 figure revenues. With experience as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA), he has guided multiple organizations through successful growth-to-value transitions and financial transformations.

Similar Posts